Paragraph 1: Allegations of Sexual Misconduct against Bishop John Perumbalath

Bishop John Perumbalath of Liverpool faces serious allegations of sexual assault and harassment stemming from his tenure as Bishop of Bradwell in Essex. One woman alleges that Perumbalath forcefully kissed her, touched her breasts, and made inappropriate comments on multiple occasions between 2013 and 2019. A particularly disturbing incident recounted by the woman describes Perumbalath pressing his face against hers, whispering "I love you," and then biting her neck. Adding to the gravity of the situation, a female bishop has also accused Perumbalath of sexual harassment. These accusations have sparked widespread calls for his resignation and a thorough investigation into his conduct.

Paragraph 2: Calls for Resignation and Internal Church Response

The gravity of the accusations has prompted six senior leaders within the Diocese of Liverpool to publicly call for Perumbalath’s resignation. In a signed statement, they expressed their belief that Perumbalath’s position is "untenable" and that he must step aside from all ministry during the investigation. This statement reflects a growing concern within the diocese about the impact of these allegations on the church’s credibility and the need to prioritize safeguarding. The signatories include prominent figures within the diocese such as the chairs of the House of Laity and the House of Clergy, the Dean of Liverpool, and three Archdeacons. Their collective call for Perumbalath’s resignation underscores the seriousness of the situation.

Paragraph 3: Perumbalath’s Denial and Previous Investigations

Perumbalath vehemently denies all allegations, claiming the encounters took place in public settings with witnesses present. He emphasizes his cooperation with previous investigations by the National Safeguarding Team and Essex police, which resulted in no further action. Perumbalath maintains that he has done nothing wrong, but acknowledges the importance of considering how his actions might be perceived. He asserts his commitment to safeguarding and his willingness to comply with any further investigations. This denial and emphasis on his past cooperation with investigations form a key part of his defense.

Paragraph 4: Church Handling of the Allegations and Accusations of a Cover-Up

The Church of England’s handling of the initial complaints has drawn significant criticism and accusations of a cover-up. A Church panel found no safeguarding concerns regarding the first woman’s accusations, while the second complaint, from the female bishop, was not accepted due to exceeding a one-year time limit for reporting. The fact that Perumbalath was not stood down during the investigations, and that a church judge refused to extend the time limit for the second complaint, has fueled suspicion of a deliberate attempt to protect him. This perceived inaction and the procedural barriers faced by the complainants have further eroded trust in the Church’s handling of such sensitive matters.

Paragraph 5: The Role of Archbishop Stephen Cottrell and Previous Safeguarding Controversies

The controversy surrounding the Perumbalath case is further complicated by the involvement of Archbishop Stephen Cottrell, the interim head of the Church of England. Cottrell, who previously served as Bishop of Chelmsford when Perumbalath was a junior bishop in the same area, was aware of the allegations before Perumbalath’s appointment to Liverpool. Cottrell himself has faced scrutiny over his handling of a past sexual abuse case, adding fuel to the accusations of a systemic issue within the Church. The fact that Cottrell succeeded Justin Welby, who resigned over his handling of abuse cases, further highlights the ongoing challenges the Church faces in addressing safeguarding concerns effectively.

Paragraph 6: Wider Implications and Calls for Accountability

The Perumbalath case raises serious questions about the Church of England’s ability to address allegations of sexual misconduct within its ranks. Reverend Robert Thompson, a member of the Church’s General Synod, has directly accused Cottrell of a cover-up, alleging a "protectionist culture" among bishops. The Church of England maintains that it followed safeguarding guidelines, and that Perumbalath engaged with a "learning outcome" identified during the process. However, the ongoing controversy and the calls for resignation underscore the deep damage these allegations have inflicted on the Church’s reputation and the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in handling such cases. The case highlights the need for robust and independent investigations, the removal of procedural barriers that hinder victims from coming forward, and a culture that prioritizes the safety and well-being of those who have experienced abuse.

© 2025 Tribune Times. All rights reserved.