This article discusses the potential for an AI-enhanced art auction to be controversial, with artists, particularly those in large-scale legal battles over the use of AI models for their work, demanding a significant financial and legal deal. The artwork is part of Christie’s New York sale, which will focus on 3,300 artists competing for lucrative prices ranging from $10,000 to $182,500 or £7,000 to £662,500. The case of the piece by Linda Dounia Rebeiz leads to a petition against the use of AI models for creating art, with several artists having long been involved in lawsuits over the same issue. The Christie’s Digital Art department also addressed concerns about the ethical use of AI, stating that while it is not illegal to use AI, companies cannot operate profitably without owners.
Another piece in the article features the work of Skip Charles Csuri, one of the artists featured in the auction.עביר this piece includes seven artists – including Holly Herndon, a prominent artist whose work has sparked controversy over the use of AI models – whose performance and art are prominently displayed. The Christie’s digital art team also forgive the artists for their stance that the pot uk being controlled, but the auction appears to take a step toward mass theft as champagne // sneakers and other luxury items are being sold.
The motivating spirit behind the rise of AI in art may be less clear to some, as the technology is often used for production and commercialization without proper authorization or consent. The potential consequences for artists in the sale itself are another concern, as the Christie’s Women Museum has announced that audiences are not allowed to view any of the works in the auction due to the destruction of educational exhibits. Despite the public backlash, the events appear to be a response to the ethical concerns brought up by the artists and消费者的 demands.
